Editorial - Australian Medical Journal 179:
370-371,
6 Oct
2003
We got it wrong on shoulder dislocation. Don't use a sling.
George AC Murrell, MBBS, DPhil
Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, and Orthopaedic Research Institute
St George Hospital Campus, University of New South Wales
Sydney, Australia
Making the external rotation splint:
play
movie
(1.23 or 2.95 Mb) If you are
having difficulty playing the video you may need to upgrade your version
of QuickTime
Player
For several thousand
years, even before Hippocrates used his hot poker, dislocated shoulders
have been treated in a sling with the arm internally
rotated. In spite of, and perhaps because of, using the same treatment
for so long, there is little information that it does any good. A number
of studies of non-operative treatment for anterior shoulder instability
have been unable to show one treatment regime to be any better than another,
and all have been unable to reduce the recurrence
rate.3 Surgery
has had better outcomes in terms of
recurrence,7
and even for symptoms.
In a randomized clinical trial comparing sling immobilization
versus arthroscopic surgery in first time shoulder dislocation, Kirkley et
al6 showed
a recurrence rate in the surgical group
of
16% at 2 years versus 47% in the sling group. The patients who had not re-dislocated
in the non-operative group also had worse functional scores than the surgical
group. One answer for the poor outcomes in the non-operative treatment of dislocating
shoulders may lie in the patho-anatomy of dislocated shoulders and the inability
of non-operative methods to correct this pathology. When the shoulder dislocates
the major damage is a disruption of the labrum and capsule from the anterior
glenoid -- a Bankart
lesion.1 The
labrum constitutes the fibrocartilogenous rim of the glenoid and contributes
to shoulder stability by elevating the glenoid edge and providing attachment
of the glenohumeral ligaments.
Most surgical procedures aim to reattach the Bankart lesion to the fibrocartilogenous rim of the glenoid. It was thought that this lesion did not heal back to bone, and this was why the outcomes of non-operative treatment have been so poor, and why surgical reattachment has much better success rates.
However, two teams of researchers, one in Japan5 and
one in
Australia2
have shown that by putting the arm in internal rotation --
how
it is normally positioned in a sling -- the labral detachment is actually more
pronounced (Figure 1a). When the arm is placed in external rotation, the labrum
becomes re-apposed to the glenoid rim (Figure 1b). The first
study5
involved magnetic resonance imaging of shoulders
with recently dislocations in both internal and external rotation. The Bankart
lesion was more marked in external rotation and became far less obvious in internal
rotation.
The second study2
artificially created Bankart lesions in cadaver
shoulders and measured the force transmitted to the glenoid rim in different
arm positions. There was no contact force generated when the arm was internally
rotated and maximal force when placed in 45 degrees of external rotation.
Most recently Itoi et al.4 have
shown in a randomized clinical trial that patients immobilized in 10 degrees
of external rotation (Figure 2) for three weeks following anterior dislocation
had a recurrence rate of 0/20, compared with 6/20 when immobilized in internal
rotation at 13-15 months.
It seems like we got it wrong, and that if we are
to treat anterior shoulder dislocation non-operatively, the arm should be positioned
in external rotation (Figure 2), or at the very least -- do not use a sling!
|
Figure 1.
Schematic of the capsulo-labral detachment - Bankart lesion (arrow) following anterior shoulder dislocation with the arm positioned in (a) internal rotation
(ie as it would with the arm in a sling), and in (b) external rotation.
|
 |
|
Figure 2.
Illustration of a patient fitted with an external rotation splint
(photo and movie kindly provided by Professor Itoi) . |
 |
References:
- Bankart ASB: The pathology and treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder-joint. British Medical Journal 26: 23-9, 1938
- Hatrick C, O'Leary S, Miller B, Goldberg J, Sonnabend D, Walsh W. Should acute anterior dislocation of the shoulder be treated in external rotation. in 48th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. 2002. Dallas, Texas: poster 0830.
- Hayes K, Callanan M, Walton J, Tzannes A, Paxinos A, Murrell GAC: Shoulder instability - management and rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 32: 497-509, 2002
- Itoi E, Hatakeyama Y, Kido T, Sato K, Minagawa H, Wakabayashi I, Kobayashi Y. A new method of immobilization after dislocation of the shoulder: A prospective randomized study. in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Specialty Day Meeting. 2003. New Orleans, LA: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, paper # 8
- Itoi E, Sashi R, Minagawa H, Shimizu T, Wakabayashi I, Sato K: Position of immobilization after dislocation of the glenohumeral joint. A study with use of magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A: 661-7., 2001
- Kirkley A, Griffin S, Richards C, Miniaci A, Mohtadi N: Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of immediate arthroscopic stabilization versus immobilization and rehabilitation in first traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 15: 507-14, 1999
- Paxinos A, Walton J, Tzannes A, Callanan M, Hayes K, Murrell GAC: Advances in the management of traumatic anterior and atraumatic multidirectional shoulder instability. Sports Medicine 31: 819-28, 2001
Warning: No person should rely on the contents of this website without first
obtaining advice from a qualified person. The South East Sydney Area Health Service, St
George Hospital, the University of New South Wales, the Orthopaedic Research Institute, the authors, consultants, and website manager expressly disclaim all and any liability and responsibility to any person, whether a reader of the website or not, in respect of anything, and of the consequence of anything, done or omitted to be done by any such person in reliance, whether wholly or partially, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this website.
|